Today, electronic signatures – like DocuSign – are everywhere in business. They’re quick, convenient, and fit perfectly in our digital world. But beware: under Swiss law, an e-signature doesn’t always replace a handwritten one when required by law.
Swiss law makes a clear distinction:
Only a QES counts when the law requires a document to be signed in writing.
Certain transactions are required by law to be in writing (legal form), which means that only a handwritten signature or a QES can be used. In these cases, only a handwritten signature or a QES is valid. Among frequent acts in the life of a business, we will mention:
Sometimes, yes. Indeed, article 14 para 2bis CO allows the parties to agree contractually that the requirement for written form may be fulfilled by electronic means of communication, in particular by electronic signature. However, this option applies only when the written form is imposed by the parties themselves (contractual form), and not when the law requires written form for the validity of the act (legal form).
If you require written form in a contract (e.g., for amendments), you may agree that a simple e-signature will do.
But if the law requires written form (like in the cases listed above), there’s no way around it: only handwritten or QES signatures are valid. Any attempt to “waive” this rule is ineffective and the contract shall be null and void, which either party may invoke.
The Federal Supreme Court recently (4A_5/2025) reminded that a non-compete clause must:
Thus, while the employment contract does not require any particular form, certain important clauses relating to the employment relationship must be executed in writing or by QES.
Bottom line: E-signatures are great tools, but not a universal substitute. When in doubt, go for a handwritten or qualified signature – and get legal advice if needed.
Newsletter
Keep in touch
expertise
© 2024 Wilhelm Avocats SA – Politique en matière de confidentialité – Réalisation Mediago